EPaper

Another setback for Karpowership

Thando Maeko Political Writer

Karpowership SA’s aim of alleviating the country’s energy crisis by plugging its gas power ships to Eskom’s electricity grid has been dealt a blow after its appeal to overturn an environmental ruling was dismissed by minister of forestry, fisheries & the environment Barbara Creecy. The Turkish-owned company’s projects to supply emergency power to SA were initially scheduled to be plugged into the grid by July.

Karpowership SA’s aim of alleviating the country’s energy crisis by plugging its gas power ships into Eskom’s electricity grid has been dealt a blow after its appeal to overturn an environmental ruling was dismissed by forestry, fisheries & environmental affairs minister Barbara Creecy.

The Turkish-owned company, set to supply the bulk of the 2,000MW of power aimed at reducing rolling blackouts, has yet to secure the required environmental approvals or permission to dock its three gas-fired ships at SA’s ports.

Creecy this week dismissed Karpowership’s appeal against the department’s 2021 ruling, in which it refused to grant the company environmental authorisation (EA) for its ships, citing “material and fatal” defects in its appeal application.

“Karpowership failed to (1) complete the necessary research (desk or field) to conduct a reasonable environmental assessment of noise impacts in the marine environment, and (2) failed to propose long-term marine noise mitigation,” the minister said.

“Given that there are significant gaps identified in the sound assessment, which may impact sensitive areas, and mortality rates of various fish crustaceans, specific to each region, the EA should be refused as the assessment is not sufficient for decision-making,” she said.

Without the environmental approvals, Karpowership’s aims of reaching financial close by September this year and providing power to SA by 2023 will not be possible.

IT ALLOWS US THE OPPORTUNITY TO ADDRESS PERCEIVED GAPS AND WE HOPE THE PROCESS WILL BE MUCH TIMELIER THAN IT HAS BEEN TO DATE

This failure, along with a legal challenge from a rival bidder, have stalled the projects, which were scheduled to be plugged into the grid by July after Karpowership was awarded the tender in March 2021.

However, the minister referred the matter back to the relevant authority within her department, which may come to a different conclusion, thereby handing Karpowership a lifeline.

“I deem that an appropriate order ... is to remit the matter back to the CA [competent authority] so that the various gaps in information and procedural defects in relation to the public participation process that led to the rejection of the EA application may be addressed,” Creecy said.

In response, Karpowership said it was “disappointed” in the decision given the length of time it took to come to this point.

“While we disagree with the findings on Friday’s report, we agree with the independent arbiter that there are no fatal flaws in the Karpowership SA EIA [environmental impact assessment],” Karpowership said in a statement.

The company said it appreciates the department’s “remission of our EIA to the competent authority, which allows us the opportunity to address perceived gaps and we hope that the process will be much timelier than it has been to date”.

FRONT PAGE

en-za

2022-08-10T07:00:00.0000000Z

2022-08-10T07:00:00.0000000Z

https://bdmobileapp.pressreader.com/article/281492165090033

Arena Holdings PTY